A commercial for Hillsdale College has been popping up on my TV screen of late. They are offering a free online college course, The Constitution 101. Their glassy advert lays a foundation for this gift in the claim that we are more polarized than ever before and that a return to “constitutional values,” might save us a great deal of grief.
Hmm, I thought, Hillsdale College. My memory tells me it is a small, Christian, private college, so I went looking for more information. The Internet states that:
Hillsdale College is a Christian school with an earnest and vibrant spiritual life. The College has always welcomed anyone to study here regardless of their faith tradition. For that reason, we do not have an institutional statement of faith to which all students must submit, nor do we have a required chapel service.
Wikipedia states that:
Hillsdale College is a private conservative Christian liberal arts college in Hillsdale, Michigan. It was founded in 1844 by members of the Free Will Baptists. Its mission statement says that liberal arts curriculum is based on Western heritage as a product of Greco-Roman culture and Christian tradition. Their website states that they are open to all students regardless of sex, race, or whatever.
Their demographics reinforce their stated goal, at least for students able to afford the $30,042 annual tuition and fees.
Anyway, the advert was slick . . . but it was a bit telling. All of the faces shown were white. All of the voices were white. All of the names mentioned were white. So, their message was at least subliminally targeting white folks.
Next, I looked up the course on offer and got this from their Website:
Learn the meaning of the Constitution and the principles of American government in this new version of Hillsdale’s most popular course.
The United States Constitution was designed to secure the natural rights proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence. Signed by Constitutional Convention delegates on September 17, 1787—Constitution Day—it was ratified by the American people and remains the most enduring and successful constitution in history.
In this twelve-lecture course, students will examine the political theory of the American Founding and subsequent challenges to that theory throughout American history. Topics covered in this course include: the natural rights theory of the Founding, the meaning of the Declaration and the Constitution, the crisis of the Civil War, the Progressive rejection of the Founding, and the nature and form of modern liberalism.
Join more than one million Americans who have taken “Constitution 101: The Meaning and History of the Constitution” by enrolling in this free online course today!
In this blurb, a couple of things stood out. First, the “natural rights theory of the Founding.” The other was “the Progressive rejection of the Founding,” and the third “the nature and form of modern liberalism.”
Natural Rights Theory of the Founding
Natural rights, possibly oversimplified, refers to rights imbued by nature, just for being human. So, this was a bit of a surprise when I thought they would be pounding the drum for “Judeo-Christian Principles” being the foundation of the Constitution. Natural Rights are not “god-given rights,” at least not unless you are Catholic. The Catholics look to Thomas Aquinas (surprise, surprise) for the argument “the light of reason is placed by nature [and thus by God] in every man to guide him in his acts.” So, for Catholics, rights bestowed by nature are god-given rights, and since Hillsdale College is a generic Christian college, maybe this is the approach they are taking.
The Progressive Rejection of the Founding
This claim is often based upon the small-government v. big government debate. Progressives, they claim, attempted to modify the Constitution’s structure of government and to expand the national government’s powers far beyond the framework created by the Founders.
This is nonsense, of course, as the Founders didn’t state any of the ways the government was to express its powers. So, for example, the government was empowered to impose tariffs. The Constitution does not state whether it should set tariffs high or low, use them to raise revenue, or just to protect American industry.
Progressives didn’t reject the principles of the Founders, in fact they embraced them. The Founders were very cognizant of not wanting to hog tie future generations and so allowed for modifications as time went on. Even Jefferson, the primary force behind the small federal government approach, argued that laws and institutions should progress with changing economic and social circumstances.
This claim is typically made by “small federal government” advocates.
The Nature and Form of Modern Liberalism
And, what has this to do with the Constitution?
According to Wikipedia:
Modern liberalism in the United States, often simply referred to in the United States as liberalism, is a form of social liberalism found in American politics. It combines ideas of civil liberty and equality with support for social justice and a well-regulated mixed economy. Modern liberalism generally opposes the interests of corporations, opposes cuts to the social safety net, and supports a role for government in reducing inequality, increasing diversity, providing education, ensuring access to healthcare, regulating economic activity, and protecting the natural environment This form of liberalism took shape in the 20th century as the voting franchise and other civil rights were extended to a larger class of citizens, most notably among African Americans and women.
I know, terrible, isn’t it.
Summary
I am not taking the time to take this twelve-part course, but if one of you do, I would appreciate your take on it. I would be shocked if “Judeo-Christian values” didn’t come up, and “a preference for small government.”
Generational BS
Tags: generational nonsense
I am coming to really dislike studies that group people by “generations.” A recent study included the following “generations:”
Silent Generation 1925-1945
Baby Boomers 1946-1964
Generation X 1965-1976
Millennial Generation 1977-1995
Generation Z 1996-now
Okay, first there is the problem of how many years a generation is. According to these numbers (using the difference in start-end years) these generations last this many years:
Silent Generation 20 years
Baby Boomers 18 years
Generation X 11 years
Millennial Generation 18 years
Generation Z 27 years
Do you see a pattern here? I don’t. Maybe there is a Generation High Command in a bunker in the mountains of Colorado that makes such decisions, but there seems not to be any order involved.
And why hasn’t there been a new generation announced to follow Gen Z. Even if you use the longest period in the above array, 20 years, Gen Z should have ended in 2016 or so. So, are we lumping in Generation Afterthought responses with Gen Z responses in these surveys? Or maybe they deliberately shorted Gen X to pad the numbers in Gen Z. Is great puzzlement!
This is an idiot way to stratify people. Is there no better way?