Class Warfare Blog

April 7, 2017

Oh, Boy, Here We Go Again

Filed under: Politics — Steve Ruis @ 10:06 am
Tags: , , , ,

The current administration has taken pains to emphasize that bombing Syria with 59 Cruise missiles today was a “proportionate response” to “the chemical attack.” The attack was apparently delivered through bombs and the victims were residents of a “rebel-held town,” Khan Sheikhoun. The attack killed at least 70 people, including children according to reports. No Americans have been reported to have been involved.

So, can you define what a Syrian “rebel” is? If there are Syrians fighting Syrians is this not a civil war? Why are we, the U.S., taking sides in a civil war? Were we attacked? No, the “rebels” were? Are any of the many protagonists capable of doing this as a “false flag?” Yes, I think all of the parties are. Hell, half of them could have done it by mistake. So, how are we so certain we are supporting the right people in this conflict?

When Mr. Obama became interested in the Syrian Civil War, the problem seemed to be that there were so many “rebel” factions, and that didn’t include ISIS which has territorial goals of its own, we didn’t know which of them to support. We were urged to “arm the rebels”? I asked “which ones?” And how were we going to ensure that those folks didn’t sell those arms to raise cash that they also needed? Apparently ISIS ended up with many of the arms we “provided” to whomever we provided them.

What are the interests of the U.S. here? Is it oil? (I don’t think so.) Is it World Peace? (A funny way to try to achieve world peace … making war.) Is it we have all of these arms and if we don’t use them, they will exceed their expiry dates? (Maybe.) The Pentagon seems to have been buying replacements for items they scrapped because they had no use for them, so maybe this is just part of the military-industrial complex’s procurement model. Sell weapons. Make sure they are used somewhere to “Protect American Interests.” Sell replacements for the munitions used.

Syria has been a Russian protectorate for quite some time, so I do not see what political or economic interests we could have there. I certainly haven’t heard any government official clearly explaining what those interests are.

And now we have the unthinkable just a few months ago … Trump’s War. Gosh, I wonder what use the Distracter in Chief would have for a war.

Advertisements

8 Comments »

  1. I’m enjoying seeing all the Republican Senators and Congressmen squirming when asked “So, the images of dead children changed your mind, so has it canged your mind on taking in those same children as refugees?”

    Liked by 2 people

    Comment by john zande — April 7, 2017 @ 10:59 am | Reply

    • How about the hungry children in this country for whom the GOP wants to cut SNAP benefits? How about … oh, c’mon hypocrites know no shame.

      On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Class Warfare Blog wrote:

      >

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Steve Ruis — April 7, 2017 @ 11:03 am | Reply

    • This was my immediate question …

      Liked by 1 person

      Comment by Nan — April 7, 2017 @ 11:19 am | Reply

  2. Repugs have been direly needing to “flex U.S. muscle” to show the world what men they are. What a bunch of limp dicks

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by lbwoodgate — April 7, 2017 @ 11:02 am | Reply

    • D’accord!

      On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Class Warfare Blog wrote:

      >

      Like

      Comment by Steve Ruis — April 7, 2017 @ 11:04 am | Reply

  3. Funny how the record shows in The Great Orange ones Tweets shows his complete lack of interest in doing anything in Syria. Now that he is need of a HUGE DISTRACTION we get this.

    Like

    Comment by shelldigger — April 7, 2017 @ 11:31 am | Reply

  4. Can I delete a shows? lol. I was distacted myself there talking to the wife and did not proofread my comment 🙂

    Like

    Comment by shelldigger — April 7, 2017 @ 11:33 am | Reply

  5. War is always for profit of those who wage war on all sides. There is no such thing as accidental civilian casualties when cities are intentionally bombed. The deaths are an act of murder; they are war crimes.

    Like

    Comment by Zach — April 7, 2017 @ 7:26 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: