Class Warfare Blog

February 17, 2014

When You Have More Money, You are More Secure . . . Right?

When people have more money, they are said to be more economically secure. But are they more secure or less? Do they feel secure? Recently we read that there has been a substantial increase in what is called “guard labor.” This includes private security guards (which now outnumber all high school teachers), but also police officers, members of the armed forces, prison and court officials, civilian employees of the military, and those producing weapons: a total of 5.2 million workers in 2011. That is a far larger number than we have of teachers at all levels.

Last week Noam Chomsky participated in a question and answer session via Skype with a group of students that might shed some light about this phenomenon. (Hint It isn’t just about all of the Scrooge McDucks fortifying their vaults against the Beastie Boys.) Here’s the transcript from just one of the questions (This might sound kind of random, but I would really like to ask your opinion on why you think there’s this preoccupation with the apocalypse and with zombies right now in our culture.):

Noam Chomsky
I’ve never seen a real study, but my guess is that it’s a reflection of fear and desperation. It’s a very frightened country. The United States is an unusually frightened country. And in such circumstances, people concoct either for escape or maybe out of relief, fears that terrible things happen.

Actually, the fear of the United States is a pretty interesting cultural phenomenon. It actually goes back to the colonies. There are some good studies out there. A very interesting book by a regular literary critic, Bruce Franklin. It’s called War Stars. You might want to take a look at it. It’s a study of popular literature, the kind of literature that most people read from the earliest days to the present. When it gets to the present it switches to television, things like that. Just kind of popular culture.

There are a couple of themes that run through it that are pretty striking. For one thing, one major theme in popular literature is that we are about to face destruction from some terrible, awesome enemy. And at the last minute we are saved by a superhero or a super weapon, or in recent years high school kids going to the hills to chase away the Russians, things like that. That’s one theme that runs through constantly. And there’s a sub-theme. It turns out this enemy, this horrible enemy that’s about to destroy us, is somebody we’re crushing.

So you go back to the early years, the terrible enemy was the Indians, who were going to destroy us. The colonists were, of course, invaders. They were invading the continent. Whatever you think about the Indians, they were defending their own territory. There’s a scene in the Declaration of Independence, people read it every July 4th, but not many people pay attention to what they’re reading. It’s kind of like a prayer book, you move on somewhere else. But if you read it and pay attention, there are some pretty remarkable passages. So one passage is a list of a bill of indictment against King George the Third of England explaining why the colonists were revolting. One of them is “He unleashed against us the merciless Indian savages, whose known way of warfare is torture and destruction” and so on. Well, Thomas Jefferson, who wrote that and is a very great thinker of the Enlightenment, knew perfectly well that it was the merciless English savages whose known way of warfare was destruction and murder and were taking over the country and driving out or exterminating the natives. But it’s switched in the Declaration of Independence and nobody comments on it for years. That’s another sign of the same concern.

After that it became the slaves. There was going to be a slave revolt, a terrible slave revolt, and the slave population, the black population was going to rise up and kill all the men, rape all the women, destroy the country, something like that. Then it goes on through the centuries. It becomes modern times, Hispanic narco-traffickers are going to come in and destroy the society. One thing after another. And these are real fears.

That’s a lot of what lies behind the extremely unusual gun culture in the United States. It’s quite unique. Homicides, deaths by guns in the United States are way outside—there’s a kind of hysteria about having guns. A large part of the population believes they just have to have them to protect themselves. From who? From the United Nations. Or from the federal government. From aliens. Maybe from zombies. Whoever it is. We just have to have guns to protect ourselves. That’s not known elsewhere in the world. Maybe in, say, Syria, a country that’s warring you might find something like that. But in a country that’s not only at peace but has an unusual security and a great degree of freedom, that’s quite remarkable.

I suspect that what you’re bringing up is part of that. I think it’s, much of it is kind of just a recognition, at some level of the psyche, that if you’ve got your boot on somebody’s neck, there’s something wrong. And that the people you’re oppressing may rise up and defend themselves, and then you’re in trouble. And another is strange properties the country has always had of fear of invented dangers. There is a kind of paranoid streak in the culture that’s pretty unusual.



  1. There’s a lot about Chomsky I like and lot I don’t. When he comments on Jefferson claiming the Brits ‘unleashed’ the Indians, Chomsky fails to appreciate the historical accuracy for this claim.

    As a well educated Canadian, I’m quite aware of the historical role the Five Nations Iroquois alliance (the Mohawk, Cayuga, Seneca, Onondaga, & Oneida… later joined by the Tuscarora to make the Six Nations) played in the power struggle between the French and the English (and the fur trade) and, later, the American expansion. If you lived at that time outside of the Eastern Seaboard, you too would be very fearful of this Indian Confederacy being used by anyone… Brits or French or American… against you. There’s a reason why Canada is independent of the States today and it has everything to do with being allied to these powerful First Nations tribes then. It is against this justified fear that the US later embarks on a eradication policy of First Nations people in its western expansion… knowing full well the very real danger united tribes could unleash in retaliation. Ben Franklin, don’t forget, was Indian Commissioner for Pennsylvania and wrote with a great deal of respect about the system of government the Six Nations successfully exercised for over 300 years prior to the creation of the US. And part of that success came from the well known ferociousness of their military prowess. This was a real fear and helped to justify the call for well armed militias in the US Constitution.

    But I certainly appreciate Chomsky’s general point that the constant fear held by US citizens never seems to go away; it’s object is replaced time and again.


    Comment by tildeb — February 17, 2014 @ 4:02 pm | Reply

    • I agree with your point. The Native Americans were being used or abused by all of the other players. The fear business is all too real. Just what does fuel the racial hatred of Southern whites for blacks (see FL “stand your ground” court cases)? What did they do wrong? They are the source of irrational fears so they must be acted against. It is sad.

      On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Class Warfare Blog wrote:



      Comment by stephenpruis — February 18, 2014 @ 11:21 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: