You know what this proves?
Absolutely nothing . . .
other than a continuing willingness to deceive either us or themselves.
If, on the outside chance they have provenance, that is an unbroken chain of evidence to link those bones to a man named Peter (and why would an Israelite have a Greek name?), so what? They are no more meaningful than the bones of a mastodon.
If there is no unbroken chain of evidence, would these “artifacts” be submitted for dating or DNA analysis? I wonder.